For 10-50 person UK accounting firms

Recover billable capacity before hiring again.

We identify where client chasing, document intake, Companies House checks and routine handoffs are draining fee-earner time, then build supervised workflows that return capacity without removing professional control.

UK-hosted workflow option · GDPR-aligned controls Orchestrated by Mastermind
01
Chasing clients

Managers lose hours asking for the same missing records.

02
Sorting documents

Email, portals, folders, and attachments create quiet duplication.

03
Checking status

Companies House, tax deadlines, and internal updates are manually pulled.

04
Keeping control

Partners see exceptions and approvals, not every low-value admin decision.

Confidence layer Built for firms that cannot afford uncontrolled automation.

Partners do not need AI theatre. They need clear controls, named ownership, and a visible audit trail before client work moves through automation.

UK hosting option Client workflow data can be scoped for UK/EU hosting in the service agreement.
Approval-gated Accountants approve, edit, or escalate before client-facing action.
Audit-ready Every source, decision, owner, and timestamp is visible.
Risk-aware Advice, AML, Companies House, and MTD exceptions escalate.
Revenue leak map

See where your firm is losing fee-earner capacity.

The leak map shows which recurring workflows are consuming manager and partner time, how much capacity they represent, and which ones can be routed, drafted, checked, or escalated through a controlled workflow.

Leak register Client chasing

Managers write repeated reminders, update trackers by hand, and interrupt client work to find missing records.

Typical drag
8-14h per week
First automation
Reminder engine with escalation queue
Control retained
Approval rules and full message log
Capacity check

Put a value on the admin your team already feels.

Adjust the assumptions to estimate how much non-billable drag could be recovered before you add headcount, reduce write-offs, or ask senior staff to absorb more work.

Annual recoverable capacity £119,784

About 91 fee-earner days returned each year.

Controlled automation model

Automate admin while your accountants stay in control.

Input

Client records, emails, portals, Companies House data

Sources are gathered into one operating queue instead of scattered inbox work.

Agent queue

Classify, chase, draft, route, and flag exceptions

Routine work is handled automatically; ambiguity is made visible.

Approval

Accountant review before sensitive client action

Advice, judgement, and high-risk communication stay inside firm control.

Evidence

Status, owner, source, timestamp, and action history

The firm gets operational proof instead of a black-box automation.

Revenue Recovery Audit

Start with a quantified leak register.

Your firm receives a ranked view of the workflows costing the most time, a conservative capacity recovery estimate, and a practical control plan for the first automation sprint.

Deliverable 01 Workflow leakage register

Five to eight admin workflows scored by time lost, recurrence, risk, and ease of automation.

Deliverable 02 Annual recovery case

Conservative value estimate using fee-earner rates, weekly drag, and practical recovery target.

Deliverable 03 First sprint blueprint

One workflow selected for implementation with approval gates, exception handling, and reporting.

First workflow sprint

Turn document collection into a controlled queue.

Before

Managers write reminders, check folders, update trackers, and chase missing records manually.

Automation sprint

Requests, reminders, received documents, exceptions, and status updates move through one supervised queue.

After

Fee-earners see the exception list, not the entire admin burden behind collecting the file.

Partner proof

Make the hidden cost visible before asking your team to do more.

Representative case study 22-staff accounting firm

Client document chasing was absorbing manager capacity every week.

The firm believed the problem was "busy season pressure". The audit showed repeated client chasing, folder checks, and tracker updates were creating a recurring capacity leak that looked small file-by-file, but expensive across the client base.

16h weekly manager drag identified
41% first workflow recovery target
6 weeks controlled pilot window
Before

Manual reminders, repeated inbox checks, unclear ownership.

Control

AI drafts and routes work; accountant approves before release.

After

Managers see exceptions instead of carrying the full admin loop.

Recovery briefing

Show us the workflow slowing your firm down.

Tell us where your team is losing time. We will prepare a focused briefing showing the likely leakage, control requirements, and safest first workflow to automate.

This form opens your email application. The website does not store the enquiry.